An assistant professor of law by the name of Major Coleman made an appearance on a talk show and laid out a brilliant case for why the theory of evolution needs much more inspection. The clip begins with him declaring “evolution is based on four major ideas” and that not a single one of them “have ever been observed.” Darwinists love to point out that natural selection is the driver of all change and evolution, but they simply cannot account for the more fundamental question of how that life initially originated, let alone for how evolution accounts for a fish turns “into a cow.”
“Evolution is based on four major ideas, none of them have ever been observed,” Coleman begins. “Number one, that life comes from non-life. We have not one single example of life coming from non-life.” If the video clip ended right here, this is already more than Darwinists can explain. Life arose from somewhere, but did it make a leap from a non-living entity? It’s never been observed, it’s never been replicated, and it almost defies logic that it could even happen.
“Number two,” Coleman continues, “that all the life forms that we have today came from single cell life forms. Many people do not know that, while we do have single cell life forms that we call bacteria, we have no two cell life forms. We don’t have three cell life forms, we don’t have four cell life forms. We don’t even have five cell life forms. That is, we go from single cell bacteria to complex life forms. So there’s no evidence that all life comes from single cell life forms.
This is another powerful rejoinder. If one were to think about the progression of development, it would stand to reason that organisms with one, two, three, four, indeed ad infinitum cells would exist. Single-cell organisms exist, but how is it that there has never been an observed two- or three-cell life? Not only did life come from non-life in the materialist worldview, but somehow the jump was made from single-cell life to complex cellular life.
Coleman continued: “The third postulate of evolution is that time and chance drive evolution forward. Of course, and time works against evolution. The chance of one simple 100 unit protein coming together by accident is this is a very big number time and chance make evolution absolutely impossible.” Another powerful claim. Even looking just at the scientific or mathematical probability of diverse life succeeding like we see today, the odds are stacked so far against something randomly happening and working as to make it all but impossible.
“The fourth postulate that evolution is based on,” Coleman concludes, “is that what we see today, minor genetic variation in species is evidence of macro evolution. So because cats are different colors, dogs are different sizes. That means that fish turned into cows. And of course, we know that that’s not true because Mendel proved that all the genes that exist today, you can shuffle them around, but there are no new genes that created
Watch this brilliant analysis on the central problems with the theory of evolution below:
Featured image: Screen shot from embedded video